<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running Linux Live on a Dell Inspiron 8200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goland.org/livelinux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goland.org/livelinux/</link>
	<description>Technology, Politics, Food, Finance, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psyborg</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/livelinux/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>Psyborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>Slax is my favorite bootable linux.It is clean,attracrive and agile.I suggest it to Linux buffs and windows refugees alike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slax is my favorite bootable linux.It is clean,attracrive and agile.I suggest it to Linux buffs and windows refugees alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/livelinux/comment-page-1/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>Dude, that is because he was running it off a cd...cd&#039;s werent really built for having an os run off of them. They arent really that stable themselves anyways. Dont dog linux. It&#039;s a great operating system...much much much much MUCH better than Windows. Too many bugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that is because he was running it off a cd&#8230;cd&#8217;s werent really built for having an os run off of them. They arent really that stable themselves anyways. Dont dog linux. It&#8217;s a great operating system&#8230;much much much much MUCH better than Windows. Too many bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/livelinux/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-803</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t understand why you think Linux is better than Windows when your wife&#039;s Windows machine runs for two years while you (a super smart, super technical guy) can&#039;t keep the Linux box running for two days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t understand why you think Linux is better than Windows when your wife&#39;s Windows machine runs for two years while you (a super smart, super technical guy) can&#39;t keep the Linux box running for two days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/livelinux/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-802</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;Remember, the article is about a Linux Live distribution, that is - it runs off a CD not off the hard disk. The ability to run off a CD is something Microsoft is currently developing but still hasn&#039;t delivered. For several years I ran a normal Linux (Mandrake) install. The install was rock solid and caused me much less grief than Windows. The irony is that the only reason I had to learn about Linux Live distributions is because my wife&#039;s XP box keeps dying in a variety of bizarre ways and so I needed the Linux Live distribution so she can get to the Internet. If I hadn&#039;t finally bough a Mac  I would have stayed with Linux. Windows has caused me (and my wife) more grief than it&#039;s worth. That having been said I don&#039;t think I would want to give an average user a Linux box as I still believe it has too many jagged edges. Anyone who isn&#039;t an uber geek and values their time and money should, in my opinion, just buy a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, the article is about a Linux Live distribution, that is &#8211; it runs off a CD not off the hard disk. The ability to run off a CD is something Microsoft is currently developing but still hasn&#39;t delivered. For several years I ran a normal Linux (Mandrake) install. The install was rock solid and caused me much less grief than Windows. The irony is that the only reason I had to learn about Linux Live distributions is because my wife&#39;s XP box keeps dying in a variety of bizarre ways and so I needed the Linux Live distribution so she can get to the Internet. If I hadn&#39;t finally bough a Mac  I would have stayed with Linux. Windows has caused me (and my wife) more grief than it&#39;s worth. That having been said I don&#39;t think I would want to give an average user a Linux box as I still believe it has too many jagged edges. Anyone who isn&#39;t an uber geek and values their time and money should, in my opinion, just buy a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

