<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Nottingham, XML Schema, Web Services &amp; SDO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goland.org/marksdo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goland.org/marksdo/</link>
	<description>Technology, Politics, Food, Finance, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron Goland</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/marksdo/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron Goland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-807</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m honestly not sure how one makes a compelling argument that something is or isn&#039;t simple. In the end simplicity is in the eye of the beholder. Each of us then has to make our technology bets based on what we see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m honestly not sure how one makes a compelling argument that something is or isn&#39;t simple. In the end simplicity is in the eye of the beholder. Each of us then has to make our technology bets based on what we see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/marksdo/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-806</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m not sure what you consider simple, but I consider RDF simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure what you consider simple, but I consider RDF simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron Goland</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/marksdo/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron Goland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-810</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;I believe in simplicity. It isn&#039;t clear to me that RDF meets the qualification of &#039;simple&#039;. Whatever is going to replace XML Schema needs to be simpler not more complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in simplicity. It isn&#39;t clear to me that RDF meets the qualification of &#39;simple&#39;. Whatever is going to replace XML Schema needs to be simpler not more complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/marksdo/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-808</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;Right, Mnot.  I see SDO as being comparable to a serializable RDF model, for example the Jena Model API.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do think that the RDF Model has had much more thought put into it regarding integration and anarchaic scalability than has SDO, but then again, I was privy to the development of the RDF model, but not to SDO, so perhaps there&#039;s some good stuff in SDO that I&#039;m missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, Mnot.  I see SDO as being comparable to a serializable RDF model, for example the Jena Model API.</p>
<p>I do think that the RDF Model has had much more thought put into it regarding integration and anarchaic scalability than has SDO, but then again, I was privy to the development of the RDF model, but not to SDO, so perhaps there&#39;s some good stuff in SDO that I&#39;m missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nottingham</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/marksdo/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nottingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-809</guid>
		<description>&lt;br/&gt;I think SDO is a contender, definitely; I only mention RDF because I&#039;m familiar with it and because it already has some mindshare. What&#039;s most interesting to me here is the potential relationship between SDO and RDF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SDO is a contender, definitely; I only mention RDF because I&#39;m familiar with it and because it already has some mindshare. What&#39;s most interesting to me here is the potential relationship between SDO and RDF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

