<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOA-Ping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goland.org/soaping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goland.org/soaping/</link>
	<description>Technology, Politics, Food, Finance, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/soaping/comment-page-1/#comment-5548</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5548</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how you ever can really test an individual operation short of having some known &quot;safe&quot; inputs that are guaranteed not to do anything. But in that case they really aren&#039;t testing much. My general feeling is that testing the interface&#039;s existence is about as good as it&#039;s likely to get.

I do intend however to re-write this article for different transports. For example, I want to create a HTTP version that uses Options on the interface URL and returns a header that means &quot;btw I ran a test and I still seem to be alive.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how you ever can really test an individual operation short of having some known &#8220;safe&#8221; inputs that are guaranteed not to do anything. But in that case they really aren&#8217;t testing much. My general feeling is that testing the interface&#8217;s existence is about as good as it&#8217;s likely to get.</p>
<p>I do intend however to re-write this article for different transports. For example, I want to create a HTTP version that uses Options on the interface URL and returns a header that means &#8220;btw I ran a test and I still seem to be alive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernd Eckenfels</title>
		<link>http://www.goland.org/soaping/comment-page-1/#comment-5540</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernd Eckenfels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5540</guid>
		<description>There is a problem: you cant test one service with a different interface. I mean you can test the listener, the container and maybe the stack, but not the interface itself.

With traditional WSDL-described services you can not test the operation, only the Porttype.

However it is a good idea to design for teasability and monitoring.

Gruss
Bernd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a problem: you cant test one service with a different interface. I mean you can test the listener, the container and maybe the stack, but not the interface itself.</p>
<p>With traditional WSDL-described services you can not test the operation, only the Porttype.</p>
<p>However it is a good idea to design for teasability and monitoring.</p>
<p>Gruss<br />
Bernd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

